Tag: <span>Politics</span>

Published December 17, 2025 by

Unemployment Justified

What are these politicians who build only pressure on the unemployed to solve the problem of unemployment there are other ways. Unfortunately, it is a fact that a lot of pressure on the unemployed is built in Germany, since the Agenda 2010: temporary agency work, temporary work, contracts, reducing the duration of unemployment benefits 1, although this is an insurance benefit, handle in the pension funds of workers financing the financial crisis, even though those responsible in different places to sit, waste of funds at European level (giant contraptions that are supported without any referendum), Euro rescue packages, retirement at 67, strong expansion of part-time work and 400 euro jobs, etc. In addition a gigantic public debt of 2.2 billion euros, that massively affects not only our, but also future generations. A repayment of 5 billion euro per year, we pay back more than 400 years these issues agrees are enormous interest and compound interest totals still not included. a>. The sad part of this Development is that the Social Democrats with the Agenda 2010 massive are involved in the degradation of worker’s rights.

Please bear in mind that we live in the 21st century and our fathers and mothers in many conflicts had fought to better living conditions. We live no longer to the era of slavery or in a time of serfs. Good living conditions starting with a good salary. Command Education has much experience in this field. A good salary is just the beginning – but in a developed society good working conditions should also be granted to all people. The SPD has received since the Agenda 2010 also the receipt. She crashed heavily in the favor of the voters. The CDU and FDP have a massive responsibility in this development. When it came to wages in the Bundestag, always, however, these parties have agreed. Everything is without any alternative agrees there are also other ways to relieve unemployment.

General

Politics society & social issues

Published March 29, 2019 by

The Suddeutsche

Instead the Youth Welfare Office repeatedly exploited the credulity of the mother of the child and obtained so dubious advice, which should make the education inability of the mother and a mental disorder of the small Niklas. Under these pretexts the youth authority wants to have also small bustling Niklas in a psychiatric hospital, whereas the mother defends itself. The Suddeutsche.de cited”- opinion in family courts have the greatest power that can ever have a paper about people, because it decides whether parents their children are or not accepted. Even after our present evidence appraisers are not often ill trained and applied tests often deficient. The problem of the poor quality of advice is because everyone an expert that can become before courts. Not only psychologists, educators already University graduates without life or work experience can families with their judgment about the future all determine.

A Chamber that could monitor its correct functioning, do not exist in the cases. This is known to the courts for years. Review by A. Merten and her son is not just about what to read is often in such opinion but it should be pointed out also, systematically concealing what biased experts. The task of the Verifier is to provide ordered coercive measures not by the youth welfare office or family court a legitimacy to the incarceration. Rather, it must have priority to enable the children to remain with their biological parents or family members.

If required, there are appropriate families helps to provide, to support them in the performance of their duties or to improve their parenting skills. The opinion of the biased expert in the case of the mother of the child”is marked by numerous violations of the”guidelines for providing psychological advice”after verification. Is in particular a scheuklappenhafte Determination of the bases and a following not the principle of differential diagnostic reasoning or evaluation of the ascertained facts.

General

Politics society & society

Published September 10, 2014 by

American Fund

The time and place of the meeting Gates said, but noted that Putin then served as president of Russia. According to Putin, head of the Pentagon at this meeting "Rejected the idea that Iran until 2020 will create a missile that can be flown to Western Europe and most parts of Russia." "Then he showed me a map, prepared by members of the Russian intelligence. I advised him to create a new security service "- and arrogantly boasted Gates, adding that after the" Russian back to us and recognized us right on the possible threat posed by Iran. " It is worth recalling that in early June in Geneva, held the second round of Russian-US consultations on the START II treaty, signed between the two countries in 1991, with the American side called them productive. Third round of negotiations on a new treaty on the Arms Reduction Treaty (START) will be held in late June in Geneva. The current treaty to reduce strategic offensive weapons will expire on December 5, 2009 A previously Senior Researcher Transatlantic Fellow of the Marshall Fund, "the Germany-United States," Joerg Gimmelrayh stated that "the leaders of the military departments of Russia has already recognized that ballistic missile defenses in Europe are placed to protect against nuclear missiles, Iran, instead of for protection from Russia. " "The way out of the situation may be a way to attract the military potential of Russia in this initiative, exceptional as a forum for discussion of this problem, in my opinion, will work in the NATO-Russia Council" – was certain German expert of the American Fund.

News Uncategorized

Politics the public