Tag: <span>Politics</span>

Published June 19, 2026 by

Sarko Or The Last Macho

With Nicolas Sarkozy, leaving the last macho European policy “Macho is a Spanish Loanword with the in German language a man is known, which is heavily based on the traditional images of the male gender role…”, it is called in German “Wikipedia”. Jane Fraser: the source for more info. And with the defeat of Nicolas Sarko”Sarkozy the last macho leaves the Premier League of European policy. Anyway, Oh man the last decade, the “political macho” Sarkozy something like an afterthought. At times, Gerhard Schroeder was machismo in politics in Europe still in fashion; Meanwhile, had spread but even Silvio Berlusconi the sails. With Nicolas Sarkozy, the last macho leaves the European policy in Europe’s first political League you are looking for the “whole man” now so in vain, for macho posturing of leaders you have to look now at least until Russia.

But what macht(e) him out, the macho in politics? Now, simply said his political specimens that unites the machismo that It does set virility in the doubt instead of politics to the show. A First Lady as beautiful or at least young is of course (at the upper-macho Silvio Berlusconi even just for one night) and extremely sensitive reactions, if the male ‘honor’, say: the ego Gets a shock or is offended at all. Outside thick watches harm and machismo with body size must have to do cigars not and something… Triumph of the technocrats who has replaced it, the European top Machos? It seems as if were already for some time rather sober technocratic journeymen on the train; Angela Merkel about, Mario Monti and now Francois hollande. The policy has now but “better” without macho men? Well, whether the eternal “constraints” assertions to more lead than Basta “-swagger, big gestures and ambiguous grin, is doubtful confidently and who shamelessly lying to the inclined voters, is not even yet.” She is boring However, the macho loose policy, become, but there are broken to even serious times. BU-huh.

General

Politics society & social issues

Published March 29, 2019 by

The Suddeutsche

Instead the Youth Welfare Office repeatedly exploited the credulity of the mother of the child and obtained so dubious advice, which should make the education inability of the mother and a mental disorder of the small Niklas. Under these pretexts the youth authority wants to have also small bustling Niklas in a psychiatric hospital, whereas the mother defends itself. The Suddeutsche.de cited”- opinion in family courts have the greatest power that can ever have a paper about people, because it decides whether parents their children are or not accepted. Even after our present evidence appraisers are not often ill trained and applied tests often deficient. The problem of the poor quality of advice is because everyone an expert that can become before courts. Not only psychologists, educators already University graduates without life or work experience can families with their judgment about the future all determine.

A Chamber that could monitor its correct functioning, do not exist in the cases. This is known to the courts for years. Review by A. Merten and her son is not just about what to read is often in such opinion but it should be pointed out also, systematically concealing what biased experts. The task of the Verifier is to provide ordered coercive measures not by the youth welfare office or family court a legitimacy to the incarceration. Rather, it must have priority to enable the children to remain with their biological parents or family members.

If required, there are appropriate families helps to provide, to support them in the performance of their duties or to improve their parenting skills. The opinion of the biased expert in the case of the mother of the child”is marked by numerous violations of the”guidelines for providing psychological advice”after verification. Is in particular a scheuklappenhafte Determination of the bases and a following not the principle of differential diagnostic reasoning or evaluation of the ascertained facts.

General

Politics society & society

Published September 10, 2014 by

American Fund

The time and place of the meeting Gates said, but noted that Putin then served as president of Russia. According to Putin, head of the Pentagon at this meeting "Rejected the idea that Iran until 2020 will create a missile that can be flown to Western Europe and most parts of Russia." "Then he showed me a map, prepared by members of the Russian intelligence. I advised him to create a new security service "- and arrogantly boasted Gates, adding that after the" Russian back to us and recognized us right on the possible threat posed by Iran. " It is worth recalling that in early June in Geneva, held the second round of Russian-US consultations on the START II treaty, signed between the two countries in 1991, with the American side called them productive. Third round of negotiations on a new treaty on the Arms Reduction Treaty (START) will be held in late June in Geneva. The current treaty to reduce strategic offensive weapons will expire on December 5, 2009 A previously Senior Researcher Transatlantic Fellow of the Marshall Fund, "the Germany-United States," Joerg Gimmelrayh stated that "the leaders of the military departments of Russia has already recognized that ballistic missile defenses in Europe are placed to protect against nuclear missiles, Iran, instead of for protection from Russia. " "The way out of the situation may be a way to attract the military potential of Russia in this initiative, exceptional as a forum for discussion of this problem, in my opinion, will work in the NATO-Russia Council" – was certain German expert of the American Fund.

News Uncategorized

Politics the public