Tag: geography

Counting on national and international support (in this case of companies transnational, organizations not-governmental or even though of countries developed interested in supporting action that benefits social, or the same one to get external prestgios), the movement dynamically follows its fight and acting occupying lands in almost all the country. What if it can conclude of the presented study is that one remodels agrarian in Brazil hardly will be materialize. Two factors can thus be cited that contribute for such occurrence. First, the proper agrarian structure installed in the country in the colonial period (the donation of the sesmarias) and that still it exists in the current days (being that little thing was modified). As a factor of excellent importance is the fact of that the property of the land always was and still is intent at the hands of few people (these, most of the time the ones that they withhold the power politician, then the ones that could make some thing, to put the situation is remained other people’s). Go to Pinterest for more information.

It is I validate to point out also the participation and importance of movements to say in the agrarian question in Brazil, then in the sequels of our historical process of land distribution. How much to the MST, this in the most organized movement of fight of the land that acts in the country, considering that this not only demands land questions, harms in almost all consists the sectors of the society (health, education, culture, economy, etc.), thus demonstrating to its organization before the public power and the State.REFERENCES ADAS, Melhem, 1938 Geographic Panorama of Brazil: partner-space contradictions, impasses and challenges; Sergio Adas (collaborating). 3. Ed. Reform. So Paulo: Modern, 1998. BRAZIL, Constitution (1988). Brasilia: Federal Senate Edition Undersecretary’s office Techniques, 2007. MST, Vestibule. Available in.

General

The main point of the discord between Brazil and Argentina, but mainly, on the part of Argentina, was accurately this river, whose passage was unknown in 1750. But that already it appeared in the Treat one to Madrid, as being the point that delimited the border between Brazil and Argentina in the region of the Territory of the Missions. This river, later, in 1759, the Portuguese and Spanish, in charge commissioners of landmarks in this year, after having recognized, and explored the Pepiri, had gone down the unknown river, tributary of the Iguau, which had given to the name of River Saint Antonio; he corresponded this to the express determination in the Treated one to 1750. Regarding the controversy, around the localization of the River Saint Antonio, stranger in 1750, D' AMARAL, 2003, p.110, observes the following one: the strategy of defense of Rio Branco, with regard to the question of the Missions, was very simple, but very laborious: to find the map that the accurate position of the Peperi Rivers proved conclusive, or Pequeri and Santo Antonio. continuing its comment, it says: this map existed outside done in 1749 to guide the Treat one to 1750. It was the map of the Cuts.

Of it two copies were only known: of Borges de Castro, favorable to Brazil, and the Frenchman, where, modified the positions of the rivers, related above, it attended reason Argentina. She was necessary, therefore, to find the original. This the knot of the question. After clarified, the main reasons of the dispute Argentine-Brazilian regarding the Territory of the Missions; it is important to point in this brief paragraph, that Rio Branco, was not since the beginning to the front of the negotiations with regard to the question of the Missions. Before exactly to go Washington to present it President Cleveland, had obtains (Rio Branco), a good amount of documents favorable to Brazil.

News Uncategorized