Contrary to the declarations of the demonstrators and to the opinion of the majority of the means, that by default are of lefts and applaud any rise that cheers to the life with chaos and violence to them, the changes proposed in the Lebanon, Tunisia and Egypt are not for democratising the region but to drag it towards the most extreme positions of the Islam. In the Arab countries the opposition of democratic parties does not exist, for that reason the governments most similar to our western republics are those where instead of a king there is a dictator, who of as much in as much flame to elections winning with overwhelming majority. That has been the case of Tunisia where the Abidine governed Zine Horseradish tree Ali from 1987 to 2011 following the political western pro restored by Habib Bourghiba, that overthrew to the monarchy in 1957 and was the first nationalistic president of the republic. Tunisia until now has been the most moderate and ample state of mind of the Arab world. In no other Arab-Muslim society it exists more freedom and tolerance. women enjoy the same rights that any western woman. The abortion is even allowed.
So that Tunisia managed to evolve socially, it had to prohibit the use of the Party Islamist, reason by which deported its head Rached Ghannouchi, who finishes returning after 22 years of I exile. Ghannouchi said that it does not want to be president and that he is a moderate Muslim. Egypt with partially similar social characteristics a those of Tunisia although with majors restrictions towards the women, in 1952 one became independent from his monarchy and one became republic. Since then it hardly had three presidents: Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak. Sadat was assassinated by militants of the Egyptian Islamic Yihad, a loosening of the Muslim Brotherhood, in repudio to the treaty of peace that signed with Israel.
